This is one of my big criticisms of the shift in the scoring to IJS scoring. While 6.0 system was a hot mess express, it put equal weight on presentation (music intepretation, costume, connecting steps). IJS made the programs far more technically difficult and pushed the sport in positive ways, but there were some side effects that suck.
The new scoring system means that you can get a very high Program Components Score (the equivalent of Presentation under 6.0) by essentially jamming lots of skills into your connecting steps. That’s why you see so many people doing twizzles (long spins across the ice), lots of rocker-chocktaws (a type of turn), etc - each one helps up their points. Whether or not it actually is a BETTER performance is less important than how many times your step changes direction. There’s a lot of points-jamming in choreography these days (you pretty much need to do lots of math all day to choreograph a program now) and a lot of the muscality is lost.
The drama of the 2018 Winter Ladies was that Evgenia Medvedeva (called Zhenya) lost gold by 1.31 points, which were only awarded because the winning lady Alina Zagitova put ALL her jumps in the second half of her program which gave her a slight bonus point edge. It makes programs awfully weird to watch. Zhenya’s interpretation was worlds ahead of Evgenia and under 6.0 system, she would’ve actually won because the presentation score was meant to be used as a tiebreaker. After that olympics, they actually changed the IJS rules and made a rule called the “Alina rule” where you can’t just NOT jump in the first half of the program. She wouldn’t have won now that the rule change is in place because she would’ve gotten a penalty for cramming them all in.
The one that probably should’ve won, which was a spectacular musical performance
The gold medal winning skate with 8 jumps crammed into the last 2 minutes of the program