I Will Teach You to Be Rich: Podcast Gossip and Discussion

Loved your commentary!
Trying to make sense out of this couple felt like trying to pin jello to a wall.

2 Likes

I knew it.

ETA: Glad everyone enjoyed my live reacts, haha. They’re fun when I’m in a spicy mood aka peak judge judy aka wearing a big lounge-y maxi dress and giving no fucks.

7 Likes

This surprised me the most! Expecting dinner dates paid-for is one thing IMO, but for a couple who is not living together covering a whole vacation seems like an unreasonable ask, especially when both people make so much money. I could see it if one person made $150k and the other made $30k or something, but that’s not their situation at all. And she can’t justify that with the whole feeling unromantic in the moment or being embarrassed in front of friends, because buying plane tickets and hotel accommodations is pretty unromantic no matter what and no one even knows who paid for that stuff.

7 Likes

I think Ramit’s point about never having any consequences for her spending was a good one. She got a credit card in HS and never had to pay the bill. I think her expectation is that someone else - her father, her husband or boyfriend, anyone - will always insulate her from the consequences of her spending decisions and basically, she should never have to pay or take responsibility for anything.

This is one couple I’m less interested in hearing a one year update from. I can’t really say why but I found the whole episode somewhat confusing or unrelatable. Before I could digest one weird thing, the next weird thing was coming down the pike. Like the guy has had this big credit card debt for four years and doesn’t have any clue what to do about it. This isn’t rocket science dude, just about anything is better than what you’re doing right now. I kind of wish Ramit had gone over his income and expenses. He’s earning $12K a month, is paying the minimum on his debt - where is that money going? Not on dinners taking her out! Not on paying down his debt! So, what is he doing with it? It doesn’t make sense to me. Same with her. She’s earning almost as much and seems to have no idea where her money is going either.

6 Likes

really I just want to know all of the titles that @allhat holds. I think you have a hidden PHD in there somewhere.

4 Likes

I feel like Ramit had a niche audience that he was doing a really great job representing and helping - people who have done a great job saving their money but still live in scarcity mindsets and need help learning how to spend their money without stress. It is really pissing me off that he is trying to adjust and widen his audience to people that he really does not understand or have business talking to about this kind of stuff. There are 1000 other podcasts that people outside of his niche would find immensely more useful.

With that said - @AllHat’s commentary is making this so much better. I also learn so much more from the feedback you all offer.

I think I have gotten all of the usefulness from this podcast that I will. I have found a better way to “live my rich life” and start to look at money a bit differently. I am more excited about our money conversations every month looking forward to something rather than just compiling numbers. I am spending less money on things I don’t care about and spending more on things that I do.

I have been on a super interesting money journey - from saving everything, becoming a strong MMM follower and judgemental asshole, joining OMD and leaving MMM becoming less of a judgey asshole, and now this podcast (like the first 10 episodes), I think I have a much more well rounded view on my feelings around finances. And that includes being less stressed around the topic of saving and spending. It has been fun and I know will go through more evolutions in the future.

13 Likes

I kind of feel for Ramit (and other creators actually) because I feel like when he was only focusing on super rich people and the rich life stuff he got a lot of feedback that he was out of touch and needed to talk to more “regular” people (I said it here, even, and I have totally changed my mind!).

Why I think I was totally wrong

Because…he’s not a regular joe, he’s a super rich guy with rich guy principles and references, so him talking to actual middle class people (which IMO he hasn’t yet, lol) is a disaster.

I realize now that I see this in other areas too, especially in athletics stuff, like where an able bodied athlete who has a podcast on climbing (just a random example) is being pressured to make caveats about ability level and speak to things that they actually have no business talking about because they have no experience or knowledge of it. Like they’ll get reamed for saying general things like, “weight lifting is important for everyone!” or “this couch to 5k program can totally work for you, don’t be intimidated, you can do it!” and then people get all pissed off (or IMO more likely they get a dopamine hit from calling the person out) like “BUT NOT EVERYONE CAN LIFT WEIGHTS! WHAT ABOUT PPL WITHOUT ARMS?!” like it’s some gotcha moment? But it feels super gross and rarely seems to come from the actual in-group?

And then the creator kind of has to address it or they’re and even bigger jerk? So then they have to start being actively insulting via the prejudice of low expectations (IMO) like, “here’s some running advice but of course it might not work if you are not also a privileged able bodied cis middle class white person who has a safe neighborhood to run in and money for shoes and free time in which to run and the inclination to run and health insurance and and and and and” and it’s like…ewwwww. No, plz. That’s so much worse than just speaking from your own experience, lol. It’s like, super paternalistic and gross IMO.

Because like, I am an adult and capable of understanding that advice in a column or podcast is just one person’s opinion and not a literal mandate? That seems obvious? And of course nothing applies to literally every person on the planet? And in the case of disability stuff it just boils down to able people reiterating stuff they think disabled people can’t possibly do, which is bananas since it’s a super diverse group in itself and assumptions that we can’t do anything are like…part of the reason ableism exists. It just ends up feeling like someone with all the advantages in life actively telling you how easy it is for them, and how impossible they assume it will be for you? Like Ramit with his “unsophisticated people” stuff and mentioning how people can’t help but be in debt if they’re around other “unsophisticated people” in debt because it’s all conditioning, etc. He only started saying that after backlash about talking to rich people only. And many of us have noted that the way he talks about these “unsophisticated people” is…pretty insulting, like it’s worse than when he just wasn’t talking about them at all.

The sports thing is just an example I’ve been noticing for a while since able people suddenly talking about ableism out of nowhere is obviously something I notice, but I didn’t really connect it to a larger trend, which I am totally guilty of in other areas! I think it does feel good to gotcha someone, to an extent, but it’s cheap and destructive. And now it’s almost like everyone with a platform is expected to caveat every experience and be all things to all people? And if they don’t attempt that the assumption is that they are basically an asshole? But then when they do attempt it, it’s often double terrible because humans only have limited experiences and it’s just…not great to speak on behalf of other groups? IDK.

I think my takeaway is mostly that my new feeling is: it’s ok to just talk about what relates to you and people like you and your own experience. I’ll def keep listening to Ramit because I find his show entertaining and live reacting is randomly very fun :slight_smile: and I do it all in good spirit. I’m sure Ramit’s a super nice guy in person, I just likes my snarks. :wink:

(And yes, I have many credentials. Several PhDs for sure, and I’m also a certified Avon lady. In a pinch I can also balance your humours. )

17 Likes

Yes that is definitely a trend I’ve seen! And honestly, also when creators are asked to talk about X current event and they’re like “I’m sorry, that is out of my area of expertise” and they get SLAMMED but like… I actually have a lot of respect for people who are clear on their professional boundaries and know who their audience is? Because it can still be in your field but ALSO out of your area.

8 Likes

I’ve stopped listening so much since he switched it up. I wonder what his listener stats are telling him about the change?

2 Likes

i agree so much with all of this. i feel like it is useful for people who are speaking to and for people like them is to be aware of it, and to be explicit about it, because lots of times people who say stuff like “everyone can lift weights” or “everyone can make their body look the way they want it to” are using “everyone” as shorthand for “people like me” or “able-bodied young people” and they really just don’t think about people who can’t lift weights, or they think that people who can’t make their body look a certain way just aren’t trying or something.

i for one appreciate when people acknowledge or at least think about who they mean when they say everyone. but it doesn’t have to be a full disclaimer in every sentence :joy: they could just say “lots of people” and achieve the same basic level of
accuracy.

my pet peeve is when people dole out advice like “if i can get this ripped, everyone can!” like lol ok mr 22 year old upper middle class white dude with hours to devote to the gym every day, sure, sure. i’m sure your program will work great on my 49 year old scoliosis body.

not that i couldn’t learn anything from this dude … but i will have likely tuned him out because of the lack of acknowledgment of the position he is in that allows him to achieve so much.

it’s like when i read cal newport’s books on deep work – i pick up some good tips but honestly a lot of them boil down to “make sure you have a hard-working wife or staff that can take care of your non-deep work tasks.” and i’m like that’s cool but please just acknowledge it!

all that is to say – i agree that ramit is much more useful when he focuses on people like him, and it would be great to hear him acknowledge his limited usefulness in other niches.

7 Likes

I get what you’re saying re: “everyone can” That just doesn’t bother me!

Ramblin' AllHat

I honestly never even thought about it until the last few years when people started talking about it as default ableism/racism/etc. (MMM was the first time I heard people saying that criticism, like his whole everyone should be biking thing as ableism), but I hear that (people being offended I mean) mostly externally and not at all IRL. I suppose I see that phrasing as a more upbeat encouraging and inclusive thing? And also a little humble, like, “I’m not some perfect person, I have weaknesses too and I can do it, so you can do it!” A slight exaggeration in order to encourage people who (unlike me, lol) might be terrified to try new stuff, or to fail or be a beginner, or have really low confidence about starting things, or assume they can’t possibly do it because of some trait, etc.

That “everyone” language makes me feel excited and can-do if it’s something that does apply to me and I just naturally skip over it if I know it’s outside my range. I also don’t believe changing the language would change the attitude towards people with genuine obstacle in a positive way…like I don’t think it would force the person to think about the “other” in a way that’s good at all, just in a way that’s associated with things they cannot do. But I appreciate your perspective, I think a lot of people feel that way and I understand the sentiment. I feel like I’ve read/heard about it a lot in the HAES-sphere and how it can be really hurtful and alienating to a lot of people (especially with fitness stuff, which is honestly probably the worst offender for a lot of things anyway). I know it makes some people feel invisible or pushed out farther, etc. I do think representation is super important, so it’s not only one voice talking all the time, in terms of race/income/ability/nationality/orientation/etc. and I think that has a lot of value- and seems to be getting better, bit by bit! Like I never used to see a picture of anyone disabled literally anywhere and now I occasionally see a wheelchair user or amputee in ads- I definitely notice it!

IDK if my totally unbothered reaction to verbal generalization is automatic adaptation on my part to an extent, like because I’m so used to not being part of the “everyone” on some level? I don’t remember ever being the norm so I don’t expect to be the average represented person in any group because I know I’m not the default. Like even among queer childless women in my age cohort, country, same race, income, etc. I’m still not represented as the norm. And I also used to write SEO bullshit headlines that got run through all those scoring things, lol, so I think that has a lot to do with how seriously I take phrasing like that too.

They could easily say “lots of people” but I guess it takes some of the punch out of it. Imagining the self-help titles that would produce is pretty funny, haha! Way more honest probably! The fitness/food industry is rife with full on lies too, though. Like, that bothers me a whole lot because it genuinely tricks and confuses people. I see so many fake workouts or bs cleanses and stuff online where the people have obviously just had cosmetic surgery or are taking steroids. That’s immoral IMO because it’s a literal straight-up lie; no one will get the results they are hawking.

Acknowledging why we are each able to achieve what we are like in the book you mentioned (unfair advantages, essentially) or with Ramit is like a whole other can of worms IMO. I see that as very separate, and I have a lot of opinions on the value of thinking in terms of privilege vs. gratitude and other vs. self and up vs. down. That plus the expectation of others to acknowledge their own unfair advantages, but I understand my thinking in that arena is pretty individualistic and based in other spiritual beliefs.

ETA: Also can I just say that I so appreciate these types of conversations? Really gets my old noggin’ going. Bunch of smarties over here…

10 Likes

I think Ramit made a really big pivot. He started with people who had a lot of money but were uncomfortable spending it. He’s pivoted to people who have no trouble spending money they don’t have (usually on trucks :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: and other things that drive him nuts) and wind up with a lot of debt. He might do well to seek out a middle ground between these two extremes.

For example, I think we’ve all read stories on the other site by someone who is on fire about FIRE and saving to get there, and a spouse who is not on board at all. I remember one spouse who couldn’t understand why they would want to live in poverty to retire and continue to live in poverty. One spouse may be FIRE and the other may be FOMO.

Another area is working with couples who are struggling with the transition to retirement. I can’t remember the name of the site, but there was a man wrote very honestly about how FIRE affected his relationship and led to their divorce. Other couples find that FIRE does not solve all of their problems and they end up re-evaluating, perhaps going back to work or making other changes. Couples navigating lean FIRE face a different set of challenges. These people might be more “sophisticated” with money but still acting out invisible scripts, etc. and may be easier for him to relate to.

12 Likes

This is the post I referenced above. It’s a long one and covers more than his divorce.

6 Likes

I’m listening to episode 36 while working and less than 5 minutes in Ramit makes a big mistake and it has super annoyed me. The couple both have student loans from PT school and they are talking about how at the end of their program previous students came in and talked about how they paid off their student loans. One woman said she put 100% of her salary toward the loans and her family lived off her husband’s salary. Then a minute later Ramit cuts in to recap things for the listener and says “one woman had her husband pay it off” NO SHE DIDN’T! Choosing to structure your family’s finances so one person’s income pays off debt and the other’s pays for the family’s living expenses is NOT “the husband paid off the debt.” For all we know, the PT wife’s salary might have been higher than the husband’s!

For some reason this really touched a nerve this morning. I’m tempted to not listen any further but I know I will.

15 Likes

Aside from being super annoyed at the most recent couple while skimming the transcripts, one thing that Ramit said really resonated with me. I think he said there are different seasons of spending in one’s life, and that’s going to evolve and change. I see that happening in my own life! I think before, I was much more “value for money” focused but now I’m willing to spend more for great experiences and comfort and convenience. I think I could have eased up a while back but it’s only now that I feel confident that I can do all this and that I’m not sacrificing my future for it.

6 Likes
Semi related

One thing I’ve learned since quitting work is that there’s a weird brand of vitriol directed at people who “don’t financially contribute” in either reality or in the imagination of others. Mostly, I see it from working women directed towards nonworking women but the tech/chronically online bro sphere is also rife with it towards women, maybe because some of them are like…red pill adjacent and terrified of stuff like divorce and think all women just want their money? IDK.

It’s really weird and kind of hilarious in its wildly inconsistent application regardless of the source. Like they’ll rage in one second about the idea of a not contributing spouse (or concern troll/condescend) and then in the next breath the same people will mention how they totally respect the hard working people they pay to clean their houses, make/deliver their food, watch their kids, do their laundry, etc.

:laughing: It’s like…whaaaa? How do you hold both of these thoughts in your head at once?! :laughing:

I know this is only semi-related since the woman in this podcast was actually working full-time, but I think it speaks to the extreme sensitivity people have towards this whole issue of “not contributing” financially. I imagine house-husbands get a weird alternate version of it as well. It’s really interesting to me when this sentiment comes up in spheres that claim to value community/collectivism, which is surprisingly often!

11 Likes

Episode 36 (Sarah & Nat) - the best part of this episode is the follow-up emails, most of which were not read on air. By the end of the episode I wondered if Ramit and this couple had made any progress. The follow-up email indicated a lot more progress than I anticipated from listening to the episode.

To get the follow-ups you have to give them your email address. I unsubscribed almost immediately because I think I was getting several emails a day - way more than the one a week I was willing to tolerate.

5 Likes

I’m sick in bed so here we go with live reacting to Episode 36. Strap on your snark pants!

IHTM: I got sick and stayed a snarky b

Episode title indicates these people make $145k a year and have $828k in debt which makes me feel a lot better about the $50 foundation I just splurge-purchased. Title also indicates they feel “paralyzed” by the massive amount of debt they decided to take on. Of all the people Ramit meets in financial crisis veterinarians and physical therapists are in the worst situation bc of their student debt, says he.

Woman says after you graduate from PT school they give you an envelope with “your number” in it, and it tells you your debt. Hers was $175k. They had no jobs and both graduated at the same time. She says they also have a panel that tells the new grads how they themselves manage their debt. She says it would have been helpful to know all this before getting the envelope of debt and also mentions that it hurt extra since she graduated from a “very prestigious” medical school. Biased Against This Elitist Academia Attitude AllHat wonders why she was smart enough for the hardest school and program ever but had no understanding at all that she’d be charged money for her education. I’m saltier than lay’s today, y’all! Lookout!

Guy says he didn’t have this experience of shock or dread at all after graduating. He thought it was to be expected and that it would suck. He says he hasn’t been happy about the debt, and has more than her, but it doesn’t feel as heavy to him as it does to her.

Also this all took place 10 years ago and their debt has only increased since then. Ramit mentions how unfair it is that it was at the end of the program that the school went over how much debt they’d have and not the beginning. It’s almost like educational institutions aren’t bastions of pure good. Cray.

Woman says when she was considering school she thought it sounded like a lot of debt but she trusted that the school knew what a PT would make, and figured they were looking out for their grads and wouldn’t put them in a bad position. She also says she didn’t understand money at all at the time, and just trusted the institution/establishment. She says if she’d known about the debt (I think she means if she had internalized and understood it) she might have gone to an in state school, lived at home those years, etc. and she now shares that with PT students she comes into contact with. Ethicist AllHat gives her a gold star for that.

Man knew in relative terms what he was facing after school, but thought it would be worth it since he wanted to pursue his dreams. He knew it would be hard. If he looked back though he says he wouldn’t take it on. He didn’t consider “what it would do to someone else” and his parents didn’t teach him about money. Oh he means his marriage, he says he had no idea the impact it would have on his marriage and that he wouldn’t have done this if he could go back. He sounds like he’s near tears and it’s pretty sad. :frowning: You can feel the desperation in his voice.

Ramit wants us to listen to clues about why they made their career decisions. He’s talking predatory student loans I think. He wants us to think about how many of us make big money decisions without weighing the implications. Ramit hates hearing the regret in their voices.

Sarah (the woman) says they even considered not having a second kid because of the debt. She says this was especially hard to think about since “the whole point I went into PT was so I could have a family” and in the end they did have a second child. She says now she feels like she’s drowning because the cost of childcare is more than she makes most months. It feels like they’ve had to give up some of their lifestyle dreams. She doesn’t know what the way out is. They’re just surviving. Outdated Movie Quote AllHat says, “I do not think that means what you think it means.”

Ramit asks what other PTs are doing about this situation. Great question which I was also wondering. She says some of her friends have paid it off, but she assumes they put most of their salary towards their debt because their spouse was in a “nicer position job”, but she caveats that this is her assumption and she doesn’t actually know their financial picture. She also says she doesn’t blame her husband for not being better off but she says he blames himself. She says they got there together. They do know another couple who are both PTs, and their debt was double this couple talking, but she said the guy worked two jobs and does “cash pay PT” which they’ve considered but not done themselves. She said they’re the only ones she knows of who made enough more to pay off debt. She also mentions how some people are wealthier and their parents paid for their grad school.

Guy says the PTs he know fall into three categories: only one PT in the family and the other person makes a lot of money (lol, like both of these people already make a lot of money but ONLY COMPARE UPWARD is like the rule of law or something), one person is ok with being super aggressive about paying it down (working 100 hours a week) but the other person doesn’t have debt, people just eat the debt and kick the can down the road. He says he doesn’t think there’s another option and that the cost of PT school is absurd. I agree on that count. He makes $102k and she makes $42k, she says the most she’s made is $70k without benefits (wtf?!).

Is this podcast just to talk people out of being PTs now? Because it’s working. I’m def not going to PT school now.

She says she does most of the childcare, youngest kiddo is 6 months old. She says she struggles with her job and what to do with it since it’s not enough money. OMG she’s been there for 10 years?! Sidenote Entrepreneur AllHat wonders why these people don’t try to work for themselves?! Maybe that’s not a good gig either, IDK, but it seems nutso to me to work so long at one place and have a huge following and make like $42k a year. She’s mentioning considering a cash pay business. Talking about how insurance is the reason PTs are paid so poorly. Hard agree. Let’s also talk about the artificial shortage of doctors caused by the profession itself mandating very few licenses a year.

He hates his current job. She likes her job. It’s either job you like with little money or job you hate with lots of money. It’s really weird to me that neither of them have considered working in a different field?

Ramit thinks they seem trapped and talk only in PT type terms. Sudden Ramit Fangirl AllHat agrees. Ramit says the student loan forgiveness program also has an aspect that PARALYZES them. They are totes paralyzed guys. (I’m just funnin’ – it doesn’t really offend me when people say this I just think it’s funny bc people are offended by equally benign turns of phrase which obviously have alternate meanings in context. - Parenthetical AllHat).

Ah, I guess you have to pay taxes on the student loan forgiveness? That’s the other thing that’s upsetting them, wait is this for real? If so that’s super fucked up. Ok so you pay $1500 a month (IDK if that’s total or per person) for 25 years the debt is forgiven, theoretically. The catch is the amount forgiven might be taxable. WTF?! Government Watchdog AllHat thinks this sounds real fucking scammy. For this couple the taxable amount would be like $200k?!?!? WHY DOES THIS PROGRAM EXIST? I wonder if this is why they aren’t looking at switching fields? Because they have to be PTs to qualify or something?

Man says the program is new so a lot is unclear about how this will actually work (since I guess it hasn’t been around long). He says maybe the plan will be to refinance the house or get another payment plan from the government for that loan. Basically they don’t know because they’re an early cohort. Ramit wants to play out the worst case scenario that this all happens (including the taxable bill). I think he wants them to admit they wouldn’t end up totally demolished or something? Both halves of the couple have no idea what would happen. They feel overwhelmed and like it will never end.

Ramit is pointing out that they haven’t thought about this, but have only worried about it. I agree. They have no idea what their options are. Ramit says this is super common because most people are problem oriented. Fangirl AllHat agrees. Am I going to start wanting to invest in crypto next? WILL I BUY THOSE STUPID TOE RUNNING SHOES? Send help IDK what’s happening to me. Ramit also points out that they will make more money in the future and basically would be “ok” if they did have to pay off the interest amount.

Ramit is now pointing out how they were kind of shepherded through this whole education decision, how insurance makes their salaries low. How they need work for benefits which is crazy and “only in America” Disability Advocate AllHat strongly disagrees. Ramit points out they chose to work these jobs for certain reasons, chosen to live where they do, etc. IDK where he’s going with this…ok he says they need to figure out what to do personally since they can’t change the system. They are deep in the system. Ramit asks if they WANT to change. He says it’s a profound question since their current behavior shows they have not changed in the last 10 years. Now Ramit’s talking to us about student loans arguments…it’s more complicated than two sides, he says. Some predatory lending stuff and how 18 year olds can’t understand the scope of loans, etc.

Ramit says covid made childcare harder…interlocking things make change hard. Ramit and his wife learned to eat in a healthy way? IDK how this is related. Ah, they wish food choices were just a little easier, like money. He wishes money was a little easier. Still personal responsibility, yes, but also should be easier systemically. He says system needs to be better, but shouldn’t this couple also be responsible? This is kind of an interesting talking point. I basically agree. These are not diametrically opposed ideas despite often being presented as such.

Ramit asks what they’d be willing to do to change the situation, the guy instantly says “anything.” ONLY FANS HERE HE COMES! Jk, but that would be a hilarious twist-recommendation, right?

Guy is talking about asking Sarah’s parents for money, she is talking about going to a cash-business. But she feels like her job is so great in terms of the practice itself so she doesn’t want to leave.

Side-note: Disabled AllHat is super curious why they are so anti self-pay PT? IME the pay models are often the same price as going through insurance or only slightly more per-session, and are wayyyyyy better for permanently disabled people since you decide how much PT you need and you just, schedule it. You don’t get kicked out for not magically becoming able or not having an acute injury/surgery rehab. I’ve also gotten way better PT pros through pay options, and I’ve done a lot of both. Obviously it is not feasible for everyone to self pay (neither is insurance covered PT, though, and even insurance rarely covers more than like 6 sessions) but it is weird to me how they categorically rule out self-pay like it’s…nefarious? Or something? Anyway, stop distracting me you guys!!!

Ok we are finally talking money. $828k debt is mortgage, home equity credit, car lease (Hyundai Elantra). They contribute $12k-$15k to investments a year. Ramit asks the guy to guess what they’ll have in 15 years. Guy guesses $400k-$500k, Ramit says currently they’ll have $780k if they only contribute $15k a year and never more. Both halves of couple agree the amount they contribute will actually be higher, like $25k. IDK what this is based on, I think her going back to full-time work? OH WAIT. I’m sorry, the $40kish salary she complains about is PART TIME? Ok, well that makes more sense, lmao. Ramit says at $25k a year in 15 years they’ll have a million in investments, and if they let that sit in 5 years it turns into 1.6 million. I am pretty fucking impressed with how fast Ramit is with these numbers. Is he able to do this shit in his head? Swoons. Jk. Or not. I don’t even know anymore.

Ramit is trying to get them to understand they aren’t actually barely surviving. Rather, that they will be millionaires with a paid off house in all likelihood by the time they have to pay off the loan forgiveness interest. She sort of agrees but instantly changes the goal post to wanting a bigger emergency fund. She also says because of past emergencies they’ve “had to” take on more debt. And that’s with her parents giving them thousands of dollars in the last several months. She says all that’s liquid rn is $10k.

We’ve got a goal post changer, people! Ramit is pointing out how she’s reveling in how bad she feels despite all this ostensibly great news that they are not in fact “surviving” but actually pretty privileged and destined to be rich. HARD AGREE. Ramit’s asking if they have ever felt good about money. She keeps talking about how angry she is about the cost of her education, especially if she has to do a job she can’t stand. She chose PT because of work-life balance and that’s what’s hard about it.

OK…hahaha, there is literally a dissonant violin sound under Ramit’s voice right now. I’m dying. He’s trying to be empathetic but like…I think it’s stretching even Ramit at this point. He agrees he wishes it was all easier for them. That benefits weren’t tied to a job, childcare was easier, etc. But there isn’t, SO, you have to make a decision on what to do, RAMIT SAYS SO. These people are grating on my last nerve y’all. They do realize everyone has problems in life, right? Like, do they realize that most people aren’t totally elated every single day going to work? And that a lot of them make a whole lot less money and work a whole lot more than they do? And end up in just as crushing of debt from like, not having health insurance and falling off a roof or some shit, and not from choosing to go to a fancy out-of-state school? They’ve got me right on the edge (any Spaghetti Western fans? No? Ok.).

Her goal is for their emergency plan to not be her rich parents. Ramit says ok, let’s do it! He’s really trying to amp her up and it is not working. She wants 3 months salary e-fund, which is $30k. She says that’ll make her feel like she doesn’t have to ask her parents for money. Ramit points out they’re already 1/3 there. Sarah is still bummed out and says she has to make more money to achieve this. Ramit says even if she doesn’t they’ll hit that goal in 20 months. How does that make her feel? It’s not fast enough. Finally, Ramit asks what if she worked outside of PT. That would also make her sad. Nothing is good, everything is terrible. She hasn’t thought about non-PT jobs because she excels at working with patients. Skeptic AllHat wants to see receipts because her attitude totally sucks and…frankly, I’ve listened to a lot of PTs complain/vent to me about their hard lives while I’m literally in the middle of undergoing extremely painful therapy which I’ll have to do for the rest of my life. They also usually think we have a great connection.

They are both still basically downtrodden and don’t seem to feel any differently. I feel like we hear more from Sarah than the guy in this so that’s why I’m focusing on her more. Ramit is pushing her towards her own practice but she’s pushing back hurrrrd. I want to throw Ramit one of those boat donuts and save him from sinking. He’s trying desperately to try and get them solution-oriented. She interrupts Ramit and says she has to go to do some childcare because the kids are up and they’re over their time limit. She sounds pretty pissed off to me.

Now Ramit is talking to us about invisible pressures, how we aren’t robots, etc. The takeaway is that it’s hard to change. He says it’s great she showed up, because she wants to change (Skeptic AllHat disagrees), but that it’s hard. She curtly says THANK YOU SO MUCH. Ramit is pretty sure 30 more minutes would have given them some tangible next-steps. Skeptic AllHat vehemently disagrees.

Oh, there’s an update letter which I think JRA mentioned upthread. The guys says he was shocked at how both he and his wife hardly responded to Ramit when he showed them how their loan repayoff wasn’t actually as devastating as they thought. Husband said it made him incredibly sad. It made me sad too, tbh. He says he thinks they’ve gotten so numb and hopeless and didn’t realize it was coloring the dynamic of their marriage. Now he wants to educate himself on their actual options. Sarah says she started digging into other job opportunities and was surprised when Ramit asked if she would do something other than PT. Ramit says in the rest of the letter they say all the stuff they’re going to do but we have to get that by giving Ramit our email and I don’t wanna.

Whew. That was personally agonizing, but I have to give Ramit major props for sheer effort. 10/10 for Ramit.

11 Likes

I’m confused about how they got to 828k in debt. Her student loans were 175k, how much were his? Did they also have undergrad loans? It’s there a mortgage included in that number?

Also, spoiler request

Can you please spoiler phrases like “divorce (blank)” from your previous post?

2 Likes

Changed it to just divorce and deleted the part afterwards about how that’s the phrase they use.

3 Likes