Covid-19 discussion

Feel better today for whatever reason. Taste, too. Maybe it was just overwhelming allergy snot?

9 Likes

interesting study on returning to exercise after covid infection - specifically recommendations around avoiding the long covid link between too-early exercise after infection. Rec is:

Only return to exercise after at least seven days free of symptoms, and begin with at least two weeks of minimal exertion

Blog post from ACSM too
Safe Return to Physical Activity After COVID-19

8 Likes

Well I wish someone had told me this before I tried to exercise

4 Likes

Yea I did 10 hours of exercise in the last week since I recovered from Covid. I didnā€™t find it challenging but apparently that isnā€™t really an indication of risk for long covid.

And now I am positive again. Wish I had known this before.

5 Likes

Ok reading those made it a little less scary. Itā€™s basically like ā€œtake it slow and ramp up, donā€™t jump in right where you were and make sure youā€™re gentle with yourself.ā€

Iā€™m having some muscle pain (Iā€™m pretty sure) in places usually donā€™t, and Iā€™m still coughing a little so Iā€™m kind of freaked out about long covid and trying to convince myself Iā€™ll be fine.

And I did a long day with a long bike ride (e bikes that I used generously but still) and definitely coughed a lot more the next two days

5 Likes

I did over 3 hours of exercise (skating) per session including double jumps, and I biked 24 miles RT to the rink. So feeling real dumb right now. Well, just uninformed. I felt fine but now I am positive again so. Great.

This is also how I feel about taking my immunosuppressant on Monday. I was starting to get RA issues again, and youā€™re not supposed to take an immunosuppressant until you are done with an infection but that marker is undefined. 3 days of negative tests seemed fine to me. No one has any data on when to take it again.

(For any mandatory reporters, I did report the adverse event of the paxlovid rebound to both enbrel and Pfizer so donā€™t worry.

10 Likes

:grin::joy: You are awesome

4 Likes

I called the nursing/drug safety line for my medication to ask ā€œhey, do you have any guidance on when it is safe to take my immunosuppressant again after a covid infection because I took it after testing negative for three days and now Iā€™m positive againā€ and they were like ā€œlol nope, call your doc to askā€

and my doc was like ā€œI dunno?? When you feel better?ā€ And I was like ā€œthatā€™s what I did last time and now Iā€™m positive againā€

Hereā€™s my question: How does the maker of a 4.3Billion dollar drug not have any guidance on when to time your immunosuppressant dose after recovering from Covid infection when we are 2 years into this pandemic?
Is the sample size not large enough?

13 Likes

Sample size low, liability high? :disappointed_relieved: I would guess.

6 Likes

how is the sample size not large enough?? the number of people that have had covid, combined with the subset of people that take the second-most prescribed RA drugā€¦itā€™s justā€¦this is ridonk. They have to do all sorts of safety studies. I genuinely donā€™t understand how they donā€™t have rec on when to resume taking their drug after infection with a disease that has infected half a billion people.

5 Likes

Yeah but, cases that COULD present data versus cases that DID provide data are verrry different circles, sadly (ie, what data did they capture). I absolutely agree they SHOULD have recommendations. I can just see how they donā€™t, sadly.

4 Likes

As I understand it, drug studies are pretty clearly defined (Phase 1-3), with clear control groups, metrics, double blind, etc. The kind of study they would need to do do in this case is extremely different. How do you collect data, verify anything, draw conclusions from a huge batch of basically anecdotes? I imagine they have far more liability if they publish guidelines than if they donā€™t. And there is no profit motive for them to do this work and take the risk. I think clinicians who are on the front lines with patients are more likely to provide recommendations.

3 Likes

Youā€˜re right but I am still absolutely over this, as a patient I am left guessing, worried I will trigger either a disease flare up or a Covid rebound. Thereā€˜s just too much pressure put on patients to understand the underlying mechanisms.

Also you think with all the patient contact they have due to manufacturer assistance and the mandatory adverse reaction reporting there would be some kind of data

10 Likes

I agree they could and should do better. Or health care system leaves much to be desired.

3 Likes

Hey, does anyone have some good, informed pieces on how we get out of this pandemic at this point? With the current variant and vaccines not really allowing for long lasting immunityā€” like, is there ever a new normal? I cannot imagine we ever have large scale lockdowns again because I donā€™t think the economy could survive it. So what the heck does a new normal look like.

Friend was trying to propose that eventually all high risk activities will go away like indoor smoking did. That seems completely infeasible to me because I cannot imagine a future without any indoor dining, indoor gyms, indoor singing worship services. Like not everyone lives in SF like him where outdoor activities are feasible year round.

9 Likes

Like it just seems to me weā€™ll continue to spread it around and people will keep getting it if vaccines and infections donā€™t equal herd immunity

2 Likes

I meanā€¦ not to be a pessimist but it seems like this to me too.

Unless a variant proof vaccine is developed, maybe? I donā€™t have the science smarts to know whether that is possible.

Agree with you that high risk events will not simply fade away because that means few to no events in cold climates for months out of the year. Which also would be a hit to the economy.

2 Likes

Iā€™m pretty sure there was a recent NYT piece, or maybe WaPo, because those are pretty much what I read, to that effect. Itā€™ll be like the coronaviruses that cause colds - weā€™ll just get it every year, or maybe three times/year. Or, maybe a worse variant will pop up.

I think there is a zero chance that indoor activities will die out because most places are paying very little attention to it already. We had a visitor at church this morning who was utterly shocked that we required masks.

4 Likes

I saw an article on this recently, wish I had saved it. Basically they (whatever experts they were quoting) estimated people would get it around every 3 years, roughly the same cycle weā€™re on as seasonal flu (apparently most people get 3 flus per decade?) and weā€™ll justā€¦ treat it like flu, essentially. Deadly for vulnerable people, mainly ignored by society, tracked by epidemiologists.

10 Likes

Ha same, totally referencing the same article there.

2 Likes